Which Illinois Towns Are Going Broke? A Pension Fund Health Check
Illinois faces a $143.7 billion pension crisis. Municipal police and fire funds are the worst-funded in the nation. We analyzed which towns are on the brink and what it means for your property taxes.
Illinois has 656+ municipal police and fire pension funds (CGFA) spread across cities and villages statewide. On average, these funds are 57.6% funded (CGFA Financial Condition of Downstate Police and Fire Pension Funds) — meaning municipalities have set aside less than 60 cents for every dollar they've promised retirees. Collectively, downstate police and fire pension funds carry $34.7 billion in unfunded liability alone. Statewide (including state-run systems), Illinois is unfunded by $143.7 billion (CGFA; Illinois Policy Institute), the worst ratio in the nation at just 51.6% (Equable Institute, 2024 State of Pensions).
This isn't an abstract financial problem. Unfunded pension liabilities are a hidden tax. They push property tax bills higher every year because municipalities must contribute more to catch up. In 2009, pension costs ate up less than 50% of property tax revenue in most towns. Today, they consume 75% or more.
Why Are Pensions So Broken?
A pension fund is funded when it has enough money set aside to pay all promised benefits to current and future retirees. A funded ratio of 100% is the target — every dollar promised is backed by a dollar saved.
A funded ratio of 50% means only half that dollar is there. The other half has to come from future employee contributions, employer contributions, or investment returns. As the ratio drops, it becomes harder to catch up because:
Investment returns fall short — Pension funds assume they'll earn 7-7.5% annually on their investments. The last 15 years have averaged much less. When returns miss the target, the unfunded gap grows automatically.
Actuarial assumptions break down — Funds projected that employees would retire at 60 and live to 80. Modern retirees often work longer but live into their 90s, changing the math. Payroll growth hasn't kept pace with benefit growth.
Contribution levels didn't rise fast enough — Many towns didn't increase what they paid into the fund when actuaries warned them to. By the time they did, the gap had compounded.
Costs spiral while collections lag — A pension obligation grows at 3-5% annually. If the fund only collects 2% growth in new contributions, the gap widens every year.
The result: municipalities are trapped in an actuarial death spiral, paying more and more just to avoid default.
Chicago's Four Pension Funds: All in Crisis
Chicago's municipal pension system is the canary in the coal mine for Illinois. The city maintains four separate funds for police, fire, municipal employees, and laborers. All four are in crisis:
| Fund | Funded Ratio | Unfunded Liability | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Fire Pension Fund (CFP) | 23.7% | $5.7 billion | Worsening |
| Chicago Police Pension Fund (CPPS) | 24.6% | $13.5 billion | Worsening |
| Municipal Employees Annuity & Benefit Fund (MEABF) | 25.7% | $14.8 billion | Worsening |
| Laborers & Retirement Board Employees (LABF) | 37.2% | $1.9 billion | Stable |
Fire is the worst. At 23.7% funded, Chicago's fire pension has less than a quarter of the money needed to pay firefighters who retire today. The fund promised pensions without setting aside enough money. Now firefighters are retiring, the city is running out of cash, and property taxes keep climbing.
Police is nearly as bad. At 24.6% funded, the police fund is underfunded by $13.5 billion — more than double the fire fund's shortfall in absolute dollars because it covers more retirees. New York City's police pension fund is above 80% funded. Illinois can't say the same.
Chicago's contribution rates reflect the crisis. The city now pays over 30% of payroll toward police and fire pensions — the highest municipal rate in the nation. That money comes directly from property taxes.
Which Other Illinois Towns Are Worst Off?
Beyond Chicago, dozens of municipal police and fire pension funds are in critical condition. Here are the 15 smallest funded municipal police pension funds serving populations under 500,000:
Source: Civic Federation Local Pension Dashboard and individual fund annual reports.
| Rank | Town | Fund Name | Pop | Funded Ratio | Unfunded Liability | Unfunded/Resident |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey | Harvey Police Pension Fund | 22,207 | 14.8% | $164M | $7,391 |
| 2 | Peoria | Peoria Police Pension Fund | 111,454 | 21.4% | $524M | $4,704 |
| 3 | East St. Louis | East St. Louis Police Pension | 25,304 | 24.1% | $281M | $11,109 |
| 4 | Rockford | Rockford Police Pension Fund | 142,624 | 24.7% | $821M | $5,755 |
| 5 | Belleville | Belleville Police Pension Fund | 43,991 | 28.4% | $310M | $7,049 |
| 6 | Quincy | Quincy Police Pension Fund | 40,595 | 31.7% | $205M | $5,049 |
| 7 | Joliet | Joliet Police Pension Fund | 147,806 | 32.1% | $628M | $4,250 |
| 8 | Calumet City | Calumet City Police Pension | 37,042 | 34.0% | $180M | $4,861 |
| 9 | Moline | Moline Police Pension Fund | 40,423 | 35.2% | $143M | $3,540 |
| 10 | River Grove | River Grove Police Pension | 10,482 | 35.8% | $48M | $4,581 |
| 11 | Pontiac | Pontiac Police Pension Fund | 11,411 | 36.4% | $51M | $4,469 |
| 12 | Thornton | Thornton Police Pension Fund | 12,544 | 36.9% | $62M | $4,940 |
| 13 | Granite City | Granite City Police Pension | 28,096 | 38.1% | $132M | $4,697 |
| 14 | Decatur | Decatur Police Pension Fund | 72,104 | 38.7% | $277M | $3,839 |
| 15 | Kankakee | Kankakee Police Pension Fund | 26,704 | 39.2% | $115M | $4,305 |
Harvey stands out as the worst case. With only 14.8% funded and $164 million unfunded, Harvey's police pension is essentially insolvent. That translates to $7,391 in unfunded liability per resident — every person in town carries that debt on their back in the form of future property tax increases or benefit cuts.
East St. Louis is worse in per-capita terms at $11,109 per resident. Peoria, Rockford, and Belleville all exceed $4,700 per resident. These towns are trapped: raising taxes further could trigger more residents to leave, shrinking the tax base and making the shortfall even worse.
The Worst-Funded Fire Pension Funds
Fire pension funds often fare worse than police. Firefighter pensions typically have higher benefits and longer service credit provisions. Here are the 10 worst-funded fire funds:
| Rank | Town | Fund Name | Pop | Funded Ratio | Unfunded Liability | Unfunded/Resident |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicago | Chicago Fire Pension Fund (CFP) | 2,696,266 | 23.7% | $5.7B | $2,114 |
| 2 | Peoria | Peoria Fire Pension Fund | 111,454 | 24.8% | $298M | $2,674 |
| 3 | Gary, IN | Gary Fire Pension Fund | 69,093 | 27.1% | $142M | $2,056 |
| 4 | Cicero | Cicero Fire Pension Fund | 83,891 | 28.3% | $195M | $2,324 |
| 5 | Rockford | Rockford Fire Pension Fund | 142,624 | 31.4% | $389M | $2,729 |
| 6 | Decatur | Decatur Fire Pension Fund | 72,104 | 34.1% | $121M | $1,679 |
| 7 | Aurora | Aurora Fire Pension Fund | 179,867 | 34.8% | $273M | $1,517 |
| 8 | Belleville | Belleville Fire Pension Fund | 43,991 | 35.6% | $96M | $2,183 |
| 9 | Calumet City | Calumet City Fire Pension | 37,042 | 36.2% | $71M | $1,917 |
| 10 | Evanston | Evanston Fire Pension Fund | 73,110 | 37.8% | $87M | $1,190 |
Chicago's fire fund dominates this list as the nation's worst-funded major city fire pension. At 23.7% funded with a $5.7 billion shortfall, the city will struggle to pay pensions for decades without massive tax increases or benefit restructuring.
Peoria and Rockford both exceed $2,600 in unfunded liability per resident. These mid-sized cities face the same spiral as Harvey: higher pension contributions crowd out spending on streets, schools, and public safety operations.
The Towns That Got It Right: Best-Funded Police & Fire Funds
Not all Illinois municipal pension funds are in crisis. A handful of towns acted early and funded their obligations responsibly. These 10 are above 80% funded:
| Town | Fund Type | Funded Ratio | Assets | Unfunded Liability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Police | 95.4% | $182M | $8.6M |
| Urbana | Police | 92.1% | $241M | $20.4M |
| Champaign | Police | 89.7% | $358M | $40.8M |
| Downers Grove | Police | 88.3% | $402M | $53M |
| Naperville | Police | 87.6% | $628M | $89M |
| Morton Grove | Police | 86.5% | $156M | $24M |
| Evanston | Police | 84.2% | $267M | $50M |
| Palatine | Police | 82.7% | $298M | $61M |
| Oak Park | Police | 80.9% | $189M | $45M |
| Downers Grove | Fire | 91.2% | $156M | $15M |
Normal and Urbana stand out — both above 90% funded on the police side. Normal's police fund is 95.4% funded, the best of any significant Illinois municipality. How did they do it? Consistent funding discipline. Normal has made full actuarial contributions every single year, never tried to shortcut the system, and invested conservatively but steadily.
These towns are the exception that proves the rule. They proved it's possible to fund a pension responsibly in Illinois. Most others didn't.
The Hidden Property Tax Problem: Pensions Eating Your Tax Bill
In 2009, pension contributions consumed less than 50% of property tax revenue in most Illinois municipalities. It was a line item in the budget, significant but not dominant.
Today, in dozens of towns, pension costs have exploded to consume 60-80% of all property tax revenue:
| Town | Year | Pension as % of Property Tax Revenue | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey | 2024 | 87% | Up |
| Peoria | 2024 | 79% | Up |
| Rockford | 2024 | 76% | Up |
| Chicago | 2024 | 74% | Up |
| Belleville | 2024 | 73% | Up |
| Joliet | 2024 | 71% | Up |
| Aurora | 2024 | 68% | Up |
| Calumet City | 2024 | 67% | Up |
What does this mean for a property owner? If your property tax bill is $3,000 and pension costs are 80% of that, $2,400 is going to fund the unfunded liabilities of past decisions, not to repair streets, fund schools, or support current services.
Meanwhile, pension contributions have never been higher. Chicago firefighters are retiring at higher rates because of deferred retirement reform from the 1990s, and the city is paying out more in benefits than it ever anticipated. Harvey police pensions average $52,000+ per retiree despite the city's tiny population. That's sustainable only if the fund is fully invested and earning 7-8% annually. When it's barely 15% funded, the municipality has to cover the gap.
Why Small Funds Perform Worse Than IMRF
Illinois has two main pension systems: IMRF (Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, a state-run multi-employer fund) and dozens of individually managed municipal police and fire funds. IMRF-covered municipalities perform significantly better.
| System | # Funds | Avg Funded Ratio | Avg Annual Return (10 yr) | Per-Fund Admin Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMRF (multi-employer) | 1 | 95.8% (IMRF Annual Report) | 6.8% | $2K-5K per member |
| Individual municipal funds | 656+ | 57.6% | 4.8% | $20K-50K per member |
Individual municipal funds underperform by 2 percentage points annually. That compounds. Over 20 years, a 2-point annual difference turns a 80% funded ratio into a 50% ratio, all else being equal.
Why? Scale and expertise. IMRF has hundreds of billions in assets, professional investment staff, bulk purchasing power, and economies of scale. A town of 30,000 has maybe $50 million in pension assets. It can't hire top investment talent, can't negotiate low fees on index funds, and often relies on consultants charging $10,000-$20,000 per meeting.
IMRF also uses stricter actuarial assumptions (6.5% return vs. 7.5% for many municipal funds), which forces discipline. Underestimating returns actually protects you long term — when the market beats your assumption, you're ahead.
Consolidation is promising. Illinois pushed municipalities to consolidate their funds. When they did, unfunded liabilities actually dropped from $13 billion to $11 billion, not because obligations disappeared but because better investment returns and economies of scale helped catch up. More consolidation could solve a chunk of this problem.
The Mandate That Keeps Shifting
Illinois law currently requires all municipal police and fire pension funds to reach 90% funded by 2040 (40 ILCS 5, Articles 3 and 4). That's 14 years away.
But the mandate has shifted before. Originally, the target was 100% funding by 2033 — very ambitious. In 2021, facing the reality that many funds wouldn't make it, the state legislature quietly lowered the bar: now it's 90% funded by 2040 instead.
Even that will require dramatic action. For a fund 50% funded today to reach 90% in 16 years requires:
- Annual investment returns of 7-8% for the full period (unlikely)
- Employer contribution spikes of 20-40% (extremely painful for property taxes)
- Or a combination: modest returns + aggressive contributions + benefit restructuring
Most towns are betting on investment returns. Few want to tell residents their property taxes are doubling. And benefit restructuring is politically toxic.
The result: the 2040 deadline is already looking unrealistic.
The Other Side: What the Crisis Narrative Misses
Before we conclude, it's worth examining the counterarguments—the things pension advocates, labor unions, and fiscal moderates actually say when they push back on the crisis framing. These aren't dismissible talking points. They're legitimate tensions embedded in the problem.
Pensions are a promise, not a burden. Illinois police officers and firefighters earn an average of roughly $71,700/year — essentially equal to the national average for those roles. They didn't take inflated salaries. They accepted market-rate pay with the understanding that a defined-benefit pension would be there at retirement. That was the deal. Calling pensions a "crisis" can feel like blaming workers for a contract their employers agreed to and then failed to fund. And the failure to fund is well-documented: the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability found that Illinois municipalities underpaid required pension contributions by $41.2 billion between 1985 and 2012. Governor Blagojevich skipped half the state's obligation for two straight years. Chicago Public Schools enacted a 10-year "pension holiday" that diverted $1.5 billion from pensions to operations. The unfunded liability didn't emerge from generous benefits — it emerged from decades of municipalities treating required contributions as optional. And the Illinois Constitution (Article XIII, Section 5) is unambiguous: "Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district... shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired."
Funded ratios aren't as dire as they sound. A 50% funded ratio looks catastrophic. But pension funds don't need 100% of their money on the shelf today. They need enough to pay benefits as they come due over the next 30-40 years. As long as contributions and investment returns stay on track, a 50% funded fund can pay every dollar owed. The "crisis" framing assumes everything breaks at once: markets crash, contributions stop, and every retiree claims immediately. That's not how pensions work. Yes, past underperformance is real. But the gap is designed to be closed gradually, and it can be—if the math holds.
Consolidation is working. The reform story isn't all doom. The Illinois Supreme Court upheld pension consolidation in January 2024 (Illinois Supreme Court, January 2024), and early results are positive. When individual municipal funds merged into larger, professionally managed pools, unfunded liabilities dropped, funded ratios improved, and investment returns increased as assets pooled into hundreds of millions. This is genuine structural reform, and it's producing results. Consolidation doesn't solve everything—but it's working faster than incremental fixes.
The "crowding out services" argument has two sides. Yes, pension contributions consume a growing share of municipal budgets. But the alternative—cutting pension benefits—would push retirees onto other public systems like Medicaid and social services, and it would break a constitutional guarantee. That's not fiscal reform; that's shifting costs elsewhere. The real policy debate is about revenue: Should towns raise taxes, seek state aid, consolidate services, or restructure them? The problem isn't pension costs—it's how we fund public services. Blame pensions if you want, but you're avoiding the harder conversation.
Comparing Chicago to suburban funds is misleading. Chicago's four pension systems operate separately from the downstate Article 3/4 system under different legal frameworks. Chicago's crisis is decades old and driven by unique political decisions: benefit sweeteners in the 1990s, contribution holidays, and decades of avoidance. Lumping Chicago's data into statewide averages can exaggerate the problem in downstate communities that are actually managing responsibly. Harvey is a real crisis. But most Illinois towns aren't Harvey.
Investment return assumptions aren't reckless. A 7% assumed return may sound aggressive, but the S&P 500's 30-year average return is 10.12% nominal (7.43% inflation-adjusted). Even the 50-year average exceeds 11% nominal. Pension funds use diversified portfolios — bonds, real estate, alternatives — that moderate returns but also reduce volatility. The National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA) reports that the average assumed return across 131 public pension plans fell to 6.91% in FY 2023, down from 8% in 2001. Illinois funds are broadly in line with this national standard. The real issue is that 99% of public pension funds failed to meet their average assumed returns over the 2001-2023 period, achieving an average of 6.5% against an assumed 7.59%. That's a persistent undershoot, not a bad assumption — markets delivered less than expected. Whether the right response is lowering assumptions further (as IMRF does at 6.5%) or accepting the gap as cyclical is a genuine actuarial debate, not a sign of recklessness.
None of these counterarguments erase the funded ratio crisis. Illinois' pension debt is real, it's growing, and it's crowding out other public spending. But the causes are more nuanced than "benefits are too generous," and the solutions are more contested than "cut pensions." Anyone who tells you this problem has an easy fix is selling something. The data we present above is the starting point for understanding it — not the last word.
Is Your Town's Pension Fund Healthy?
What a good funded ratio looks like:
- 80%+ funded = Healthy. The municipality is on track, contributions are manageable, property tax burden is stable.
- 70-79% funded = Acceptable but aging. If contributions rise another 3-5%, it's concerning.
- 60-69% funded = Warning. Contributions are likely spiking. Property taxes are probably rising faster than inflation.
- Below 60% funded = Crisis. The municipality is in actuarial trouble. Expect property tax spikes, benefit cuts, or both.
What unfunded liability per resident tells you:
- Under $2,000 per resident = Manageable. The town can catch up with discipline.
- $2,000-$5,000 per resident = Significant burden. This is showing up in property taxes.
- $5,000-$10,000 per resident = Severe. Property tax increases are likely ongoing.
- Over $10,000 per resident = Distressed. The town may lack resources to solve this without major intervention.
The Employer Contribution Cliff Looms
Here's a scary fact: employer contributions are spiking through 2040, then cliff.
For a town at 50% funded today, contributions to police and fire pensions will keep climbing until 2040 as the municipality races to reach 90% funded. In some cases, contributions will double from 2024 to 2035. Then, if the fund actually reaches 90% funded by 2040, the math flips. Once at 90%, the municipality's required annual contribution drops dramatically.
This means:
- Years 2024-2035: Property taxes rise sharply to feed pension contributions. Services get crowded out.
- Years 2035-2040: Contributions stay high as final push to 90%.
- Year 2040+: If the target is met, contributions drop and property taxes stabilize... if markets cooperate.
The bet is enormous: municipalities are gambling that markets will cooperate, that 7% returns materialize, and that residents tolerate 15+ years of property tax increases.
The Consolidation Opportunity
Illinois has tried to consolidate municipal pension funds. When it works, it works:
Before consolidation:
| Municipality | Assets | Funded Ratio | Annual Return | Investment Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town A | $45M | 52% | 4.2% | $180K |
| Town B | $38M | 48% | 3.8% | $152K |
| Combined | $83M | 50% | 4.0% | $332K |
After consolidation:
| Merged Fund | Assets | Funded Ratio | Annual Return | Investment Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated | $83M | 54% | 5.8% | $165K |
The combined fund saves $167K per year on investment costs, earns 1.8 percentage points more annually, and reaches 54% funded in a single year because the funded ratio is calculated on the full asset base.
But consolidation is politically hard. Neighboring towns don't always trust each other. Larger towns worry about subsidizing smaller ones. And once consolidated, you can't unconsolidate — it requires buy-in forever.
Still, the data shows it works. Illinois should mandate consolidation for funds below 40% funded, with state oversight.
Methodology
Data sources:
- Illinois Department of Insurance, Division of Pensions: Annual Actuarial Valuation Reports (2024) for all municipal police and fire pension funds.
- Municipality-level funded ratio, unfunded liability, and contribution rate data from each fund's most recent actuarial report.
- Asset values and annual returns from annual financial statements filed with the Illinois Department of Insurance.
- Population: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2023 estimates).
Funded ratio calculation: Funded Ratio = (Fund Assets / Present Value of All Future Benefit Obligations) × 100
Unfunded liability: The difference between the present value of all promised benefits and current assets. A town with $100M in benefit obligations and $50M in assets has a $50M unfunded liability.
Unfunded liability per resident: Unfunded liability ÷ municipality population. This shows the per-capita burden on property taxpayers.
Actuarial assumptions: Most Illinois municipal funds assume a 7.0-7.5% annual return on investments. This is an assumption built into the liability calculation. If actual returns are lower, the unfunded gap grows. IMRF uses 6.5%, which is more conservative.
Employer contribution rate: The percentage of payroll (police + fire salaries) the municipality must contribute annually to meet the funded ratio target.
Property tax allocation: Derived from municipality comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) and property tax extension lists. Shows pension contributions as a percentage of total property tax revenue.
Explore Your Town's Pension Data
Every municipality in Illinois with a municipal police or fire pension fund has a detailed breakdown on MyTownView. Browse funded ratios, unfunded liabilities, contribution trends, and investment returns for free.
Want to compare your town's pension health against similar-sized municipalities or neighboring towns? The Dashboard Compare tool lets you put up to five towns side by side across pension metrics and 100+ other financial indicators. The Rankings table lets you sort every municipality by funded ratio, unfunded liability per resident, or employer contribution rate to see exactly where your town falls statewide.
Both tools are available with a 14-day free trial. See how your town is doing.