Your assigned district depends on your home address within town.
Showing latest fiscal year. Full funding history available with a paid plan. View plans →
Illinois uses Evidence-Based Funding to determine whether your school districts have enough money. Here's where they stand.
What is Evidence-Based Funding?
Illinois' Evidence-Based Funding (EBF) formula, enacted in 2017, calculates an Adequacy Target for each district — the estimated cost to provide an adequate education. It then compares each district's available resources to that target.
Districts are assigned to Tiers 1-4 based on their percentage of adequacy. Tier 1 districts (most underfunded) receive the largest share of new state funding.
Tier 1: Below 60% of adequacy
Tier 2: 60% to below 90% of adequacy
Tier 3: 90% to below 100% of adequacy
Tier 4: At or above 100% of adequacy
Source: ISBE Evidence-Based Funding
Avg % of Adequacyi
90.3%Adequacy Gapi
$91.8MFunding vs. Needi
District Detail
60-90% of adequacy — receives moderate new state funding
The state estimates it costs $244.3M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $187.8M in resources — that's 76.87% of what it needs. There's a $56.5M gap between what the district has and what it needs.
What it needsi
$244.3M
What it hasi
$187.8M
From the statei
$18.5M
This district is better funded than 37% of districts statewide.
60-90% of adequacy — receives moderate new state funding
The state estimates it costs $211.8M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $180.4M in resources — that's 85.17% of what it needs. There's a $31.4M gap between what the district has and what it needs.
What it needsi
$211.8M
What it hasi
$180.4M
From the statei
$12.3M
This district is better funded than 61% of districts statewide.
90-100% of adequacy — receives limited new state funding
The state estimates it costs $210.4M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $208.4M in resources — that's 99.08% of what it needs. There's a $1.9M gap between what the district has and what it needs.
What it needsi
$210.4M
What it hasi
$208.4M
From the statei
$9.4M
This district is better funded than 76% of districts statewide.
At or above 100% of adequacy — fully funded
The state estimates it costs $102.3M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $113.0M in resources — that's 110.42% of what it needs. This district meets or exceeds its funding target.
What it needsi
$102.3M
What it hasi
$113.0M
From the statei
$12.1M
This district is better funded than 85% of districts statewide.
90-100% of adequacy — receives limited new state funding
The state estimates it costs $34.1M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $32.2M in resources — that's 94.39% of what it needs. There's a $1.9M gap between what the district has and what it needs.
What it needsi
$34.1M
What it hasi
$32.2M
From the statei
$4.3M
This district is better funded than 71% of districts statewide.
At or above 100% of adequacy — fully funded
The state estimates it costs $26.0M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $27.7M in resources — that's 106.43% of what it needs. This district meets or exceeds its funding target.
What it needsi
$26.0M
What it hasi
$27.7M
From the statei
$1.7M
This district is better funded than 82% of districts statewide.
At or above 100% of adequacy — fully funded
The state estimates it costs $14.8M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $15.9M in resources — that's 107.12% of what it needs. This district meets or exceeds its funding target.
What it needsi
$14.8M
What it hasi
$15.9M
From the statei
$1.7M
This district is better funded than 83% of districts statewide.
Statewide Tier Distributioni