What is the Evidence-Based Funding (EBF) model?

State funding formulas calculate an 'adequacy target' for each district based on student needs (poverty, English learners, special education) and compare it to available local resources. Districts furthest from their target receive the most new state funding.

What does the funding gap mean?

The funding gap is the difference between what a district needs (its adequacy target) and what it currently receives from all sources. A district at 90% of its adequacy target has a 10% funding gap. States aim to bring all districts to at least 90% adequacy over time.

How are EBF tiers determined?

Districts are grouped into four tiers based on their percentage of adequacy: Tier 1 (below 70%), Tier 2 (70-90%), Tier 3 (90-100%), and Tier 4 (above 100%). New state funding flows primarily to Tier 1 and Tier 2 districts to close the biggest gaps first.

MyTownView

University Park, IL

CSAChicago-Naperville MSAChicago-Naperville-Elgin#206/341 Population

Select Your District

Your assigned district depends on your home address within town.

University Park, IL School Funding Gaps & Adequacy

University Park School Funding

State Education Funding Data

Showing latest fiscal year. Full funding history available with a paid plan. See products & pricing →

School Funding — FY2026i

NCES

State funding formulas determine whether your school districts have enough money. Here's where they stand.

How School Funding Works

State funding formulas calculate an Adequacy Target for each district, the estimated cost to provide an adequate education. Districts are then compared against that target.

Districts are assigned to Tiers 1-4 based on their percentage of adequacy. Tier 1 districts (most underfunded) receive the largest share of new state funding.

Tier 1: Below 60% of adequacy

Tier 2: 60% to below 90% of adequacy

Tier 3: 90% to below 100% of adequacy

Tier 4: At or above 100% of adequacy

Source: State Education Funding Data

Avg % of Adequacyi

84.7%

Adequacy Gapi

$23.8M

Funding vs. Needi

Crete Monee C U School Dist 201u76.05%

$53.0M funded$69.7M target

Rich Twp H S District 22796.56%

$52.2M funded$54.0M target

Matteson Elem School Dist 16285.9%

$31.8M funded$37.0M target

District Detail

Crete Monee C U School Dist 201uTier 2

76.05% funded$16.7M gap

60-90% of adequacy — receives moderate new state funding

The state estimates it costs $69.7M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $53.0M in resources — that's 76.05% of what it needs. There's a $16.7M gap between what the district has and what it needs.

What it needsi

$69.7M

What it hasi

$53.0M

From the statei

$23.7M

This district is better funded than 34% of districts statewide.

Rich Twp H S District 227Tier 3

96.56% funded$1.9M gap

90-100% of adequacy — receives limited new state funding

The state estimates it costs $54.0M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $52.2M in resources — that's 96.56% of what it needs. There's a $1.9M gap between what the district has and what it needs.

What it needsi

$54.0M

What it hasi

$52.2M

From the statei

$32.8M

This district is better funded than 73% of districts statewide.

Matteson Elem School Dist 162Tier 2

85.9% funded$5.2M gap

60-90% of adequacy — receives moderate new state funding

The state estimates it costs $37.0M to adequately educate all students in this district. The district currently has $31.8M in resources — that's 85.9% of what it needs. There's a $5.2M gap between what the district has and what it needs.

What it needsi

$37.0M

What it hasi

$31.8M

From the statei

$22.2M

This district is better funded than 62% of districts statewide.

Statewide Tier Distributioni

Tier 1: 36

Tier 2: 579 (yours)

Tier 3: 96 (yours)

Tier 4: 221